I Am Now a Criminal in Canada
And don’t think I am protected since I don’t live in Canada. After all, Mark Stein is living in America and he was charged via the Canadian Human Rights Commission with publishing “hate speech” in a Canadian magazine. Also, many Canadians are being charged even if Americans post supposedly “hate filled” comments on their websites hosted on Canadian servers. Should the CHRC have their way, soon there will be a blockage of “unapproved” websites in Canada.
That’s “Canada” not “China.” It gets confusing, I know. And now the similarity is becoming even more marked than the fact that both countries begin with the letter “C.” This post may even get my name on a list someday when I cross the border on vacation or for business. I am exaggerating, but if things continue at their present pace in Canada, maybe not so much.
So, I join in with such worthies as Ezra Levant and Kathie Shaidle in their call to reprint Rev. Steven Boissoin’s “hate crime” letter to the Red Deer Advocate. This is not to say I agree with all or even the majority of what Boissoin has written. I do, however, protect my rights of free speech and press by allowing him the freedom to say or write what his conscience dictates.
The following is not intended for those who are suffering from an unwanted sexual identity crisis. For you, I have understanding, care, compassion and tolerance. I sympathize with you and offer you my love and fellowship. I prayerfully beseech you to seek help, and I assure you that your present enslavement to homosexuality can be remedied. Many outspoken, former homosexuals are free today.
Instead, this is aimed precisely at every individual that in any way supports the homosexual machine that has been mercilessly gaining ground in our society since the 1960s. I cannot pity you any longer and remain inactive. You have caused far too much damage.
My banner has now been raised and war has been declared so as to defend the precious sanctity of our innocent children and youth, that you so eagerly toil, day and night, to consume. With me stand the greatest weapons that you have encountered to date - God and the “Moral Majority.” Know this, we will defeat you, then heal the damage that you have caused. Modern society has become dispassionate to the cause of righteousness. Many people are so apathetic and desensitized today that they cannot even accurately define the term “morality.”
The masses have dug in and continue to excuse their failure to stand against horrendous atrocities such as the aggressive propagation of homo- and bisexuality. Inexcusable justifications such as, “I’m just not sure where the truth lies,” or “If they don’t affect me then I don’t care what they do,” abound from the lips of the quantifiable majority.
Face the facts, it is affecting you. Like it or not, every professing heterosexual is have their future aggressively chopped at the roots.
Edmund Burke’s observation that, “All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing,” has been confirmed time and time again. From kindergarten class on, our children, your grandchildren are being strategically targeted, psychologically abused and brainwashed by homosexual and pro-homosexual educators.
Our children are being victimized by repugnant and premeditated strategies, aimed at desensitizing and eventually recruiting our young into their camps. Think about it, children as young as five and six years of age are being subjected to psychologically and physiologically damaging pro-homosexual literature and guidance in the public school system; all under the fraudulent guise of equal rights.
Your children are being warped into believing that same-sex families are acceptable; that men kissing men is appropriate.
Your teenagers are being instructed on how to perform so-called safe same gender oral and anal sex and at the same time being told that it is normal, natural and even productive. Will your child be the next victim that tests homosexuality positive?
Come on people, wake up! It’s time to stand together and take whatever steps are necessary to reverse the wickedness that our lethargy has authorized to spawn. Where homosexuality flourishes, all manner of wickedness abounds.
Regardless of what you hear, the militant homosexual agenda isn’t rooted in protecting homosexuals from “gay bashing.” The agenda is clearly about homosexual activists that include, teachers, politicians, lawyers, Supreme Court judges, and God forbid, even so-called ministers, who are all determined to gain complete equality in our nation and even worse, our world.
Don’t allow yourself to be deceived any longer. These activists are not morally upright citizens, concerned about the best interests of our society. They are perverse, self-centered and morally deprived individuals who are spreading their psychological disease into every area of our lives. Homosexual rights activists and those that defend them, are just as immoral as the pedophiles, drug dealers and pimps that plague our communities.
The homosexual agenda is not gaining ground because it is morally backed. It is gaining ground simply because you, Mr. and Mrs. Heterosexual, do nothing to stop it. It is only a matter of time before some of these morally bankrupt individuals such as those involved with NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Lovers Association, will achieve their goal to have sexual relations with children and assert that it is a matter of free choice and claim that we are intolerant bigots not to accept it.
If you are reading this and think that this is alarmist, then I simply ask you this: how bad do things have to become before you will get involved? It’s time to start taking back what the enemy has taken from you. The safety and future of our children is at stake.
Rev. Stephen Boissoin
Some things to note: first thing, Boissoin was not targeting homosexuals as people. Any unbiased reading of the content would verify that. He has some sympathetic things to say in the first parapraph of the letter to the homosexual person, even though he disagrees mightily with the lifestyle. No, the targets of the letter are the political activities and strategies of the Homosexual activist groups. In other words, the Human Rights decision against Boissoin was specifically aimed at censoring his political views. That should send a chill through everyone; even those of the Homosexual Agenda that Boisson speaks against. Speech censored in one direction can just as easily shift to another.
Second, the ruling of the commission specifically targeted Boissoin’s religious views. Being found guilty of hate speech and being fined is bad enough, but the commission went even further. The Alberta Human Rights Tribunal recently ordered him to stop talking about homosexuality from the perspective of his evangelical Christian faith. Moreover, the government tribunal has prohibited him from criticizing the government process to which he had been subjected.
Even stranger still, the court has ordered him to apologize for his previous expressions on this topic as a Christian, and basically violate his conscience. Such an action goes beyond any semblance of justice and can only be viewed as a means for the court to humiliate Boissoin and any other people who share similar beliefs; you know, those stupid, “fundy” Christians.
The only meaningful response to such a judge and such a ruling is a single finger salute. Nor are such judges and rulings limited to Canada, though this one does amaze for sheer audacity. I am afraid that as Christians we may soon all be called upon to once again risk “our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor” for the cause of liberty.
Truly the courts and governmental systems of the Western nations are transforming into those of the Village in Patrick McGoohan’s The Prisoner. In such an environment, being charged with contempt of court will not only be a virtue, it will be the only reasonable response of a person who wishes to remain fully human.
Great Blog,
Thank-you for seeing through the numerous misinterpretations of my letter and accurately defining the proper context. Your very right, I do not hate the average homosexual individual, though I not approve of the lifestyle. It is the gay-activists, like the complianant in my case and the Commission that prosecuted me. These hyper-progay aggressive thugs have destroyed our once free nation. It’s time to rebuild!
Bless you for your support.
Stephen Boissoin
—Stephen BoissoinYou’re that is…I need to hire a proof reader.
—Stephen Boissoinwe know that christ gave us three commandments for our living out the spirit. (paul says we are led by and serve of the spirt, and do not have the old relationship to the written code, that we had under the old covenant.
one of three the commandments of love is loving ones neighbor as oneself.
what is the spirit of the essence of homosexuality and how does it come against loving ones neighbor as oneself?
Matthew 19:19
Jesus replied, ” ‘Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, honor your father and mother,’ and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’ ”
Mark 12:31
The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”
Mark 12:33
To love him with all your heart, with all your understanding and with all your strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself is more important than all burnt offerings and sacrifices.”
Romans 13:9
The commandments, “Do not commit adultery,” “Do not murder,” “Do not steal,” “Do not covet,” and whatever other commandment there may be, are summed up in this one rule: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
Galatians 5:14
—john rThe entire law is summed up in a single command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.
Is your point as follows?
1. Jesus gave us three commandments
2. One of those commandments was to “love your neighbor as yourself”
3. There is nothing in the essence of homosexual relations that “comes against” this commandment
4. Ergo: Jesus’ commandment allows for homosexual relations or at least does not forbid them?
Just trying to get it clear. If I misunderstood, I apologize, but I am trying to understand better before I respond exactly what you are saying.
it is not just jesus, but it is scripture itself that does not declare homosexuality a sin. not all prohibitions in lev, were of themselves are sins.
aul says that in the covenant of christ we are led and serve of the spirit
the power on romans1 was hid under the perceptions of homosexual sin. as yet the power of the is book is yet to be realized. i always thought that when jesus came it was an automatic leaving of the old covenant and embracing the new. history shows this is not correct. instead there has been a gradual weaning of christendom from the old covenant. the majority of christendom is still about regulation. but that is the relationship to the written code under the old covenant. the new covenant we are led by and serve of the spirit. ergo the three commandments of love which in living the commandments we do more than follow the law, we fulfill it.
the sequence is that god loved us first. its that love that we receive from him that we return , love ourselves and our neighbor.
hence leading of the spirit.
god sent the holy spirit who would show us all truth.
leading of the spirit
we seek to live thru christs spirit……….he says follow me
leading of the spirit
1john ………….is all about love that is god
leading of the spirit
as far as homosexuality goes, it is the witness of believers( including myself) that honoring their life experiences and accepting them as equals to heterosexuals is affirmed and emulates and is of the same spirt as the spirit of the loving ones neighbor as oneself.
Also, please note the post was not primarily for or against homosexuality as it was for a person’s right to speak for or against the political arm of the Homosexual agenda (or the Heterosexual agenda, for that matter). In essence it was to allow people to speak their minds free of coercion or punishment by the State. Yet your line of reasoning on the issue interests me beyond the scope of just this issue and I do want to understand where you were going with the comment. I am afraid at least to me it was not clear.
a person reaches out for equal protection, and life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ………………you are right that is an agenda. if you want a plumb line for acceptability.
in any conversation you would chose to have about homosexuals substitute the word” black” for the word” homosexual”. if its still acceptable its okay.
—john rFor any readers who are confused by the above post, John R. is responding to an email I sent him questioning his first post. Unfortunately, he did not mark where my questions were and where his answers started. Nor can I edit comments that come into my site to mark them for you.
So instead, below is my original email to him.
I am not certain just where you are going with your comment on my site. Specifically your sentence: “what is the spirit of the essence of homosexuality and how does it come against loving ones neighbor as oneself?”
Is your point as follows?
1. Jesus gave us three commandments
2. One of those commandments was to “love your neighbor as yourself”
3. There is nothing in the essence of homosexual relations that “comes against” this commandment
4. Ergo: Jesus’ commandment allows for homosexual relations or at least does not forbid them?
Just trying to get it clear. If I misunderstood, I apologize, but I am trying to understand better before I respond exactly what you are saying.
Also, please note the post was not primarily for or against homosexuality as it was for a person’s right to speak for or against the political arm of the Homosexual agenda (or the Heterosexual agenda, for that matter). In essence it was to allow people to speak their minds free of coercion or punishment by the State. Yet your line of reasoning on the issue interests me beyond the scope of just this issue and I do want to understand where you were going with the comment. I am afraid at least to me it was not clear.
—CaineGreat post, it looks like before to long, unless people understand the gravity of your post, the right to free speech is going to be less important than the right of people to do what the bible says is sin.
I’ve linked to your post from Homosexual Agenda “Make Change, Not Lawsuits” as a view into the near future.
—Wayne from Jeremiah FilmsCaine—
Undisputedly some of the best material I’ve read in eons! I would like to thank you personally for your time and editorial skills whilst rendering a rather precise explanation of Rev. Stephen Boissoin’s post.
Moreover, all one needs to do is peruse the ‘Homosexual’ category on my blog, “The Thinker”, to see that I have now officially reached that position, of what I refer to as ‘efficacy’ in my disposition with the homosexual machine.
Essentially this is without question the best reading I have been privy too and I am thankful that God would choose me to be around such brilliant minds.
As for john r: As in all things it is by his grace and mercy that we are able to do what we do. I am thankful for your site, and your wonderful ability to be as tolerant as you are! Well done! Cheers!
omc
—onemorecupOMC,
Sorry about the delay in your comment getting in. I found you somehow in my spam filter. This and one other comment. Not certain why. If there are other comments that you posted, I am sorry but they got deleted. But I have “white listed” your IP, so you should have free access in the future.
Thanks for stopping by.
—CaineI respect the goal of keeping this discussion about the right to freedom of expression, but a few of the points that John R. attempted to make that bear directly on the issue of the morality of homosexuality begs for some sort of response as well.
First, the Christian command to love your neighbor is not necessarily always fulfilled by having sex with that person. Having sex with someone is not the consummation of every loving human relationship. Rather it is the consummation of only one such relationship; marriage as originally defined by God Himself. It is indeed tragic that many people have become so morally stupid that I have to explain such a point in the first place. Such moral idiots seem to have come to the perverse conclusion that having sex with someone is the ultimate expression in all forms of love for another person. They have descended morally to the point where every form of love must be fulfilled by having sex as the consummate expression of love.
Second, the progress of moving from the old covenant to the new covenant is indeed one of moving from legalism to freedom, but that does not equate with moving from morality to lawlessness. If you do not understand the difference, then you need to study the classic Christian writings on the subject. But let me just say that the attempt to equate the two shows a perverse motivation from the outset. Once again, it is heart-rending that such a point even has to be stated. This is the essence of moral stupidity.
—John LodyI wholly agree that the Canadian government’s response to the Reverend’s article was morally wrong and in contradiction to the freedom we come to expect in modern civilized countries.
At the same time, I can see no valid moral defense to having written that article at all–it is pure vitriol and a disgraceful thing to see coming from a Christian’s pen. The only way I can defend its expression is on the same grounds that I defend the KKK’s right to express their views: that is, I don’t think freedom of speech is confined to those whose opinions are kind and tolerant.
As an aside, I don’t believe that some illogical fear of homosexual “recruiting” is in any way a political view. They are censoring a religiously-motivated viewpoint that attempts to paint open, happy homosexuals as predators. That doesn’t change his right to say it, but it is NOT political.
—Kris